California On The Web Poker Bill Sees Reggie Jones-Sawyer Heat Up to PokerStars PossibilityPaleoMD
California State Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer, whose new online poker bill is far more inclusive than previous drafts, would welcome racetracks and PokerStars into the Golden State gaming market as well.
A new California on the web poker bill, sponsored by State Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer (D-Los Angeles), is currently on the table to oppose the bill introduced by fellow State Assemblyman Mike Gatto in December.
The Sawyer-Jones bill, AB 167, seeks to establish ‘a proper regulatory structure in place that delivers safe and compliant internet poker access,’ the assemblyman announced yesterday.
So how do the two new bills compare? And much more to the level, how exactly does the new Jones-Sawyer bill compare with his past bill, AB2291, which foundered in the rocks of final year’s legislative session?
No Bad Actors
Jones-Sawyer said at the conclusion of the 2014 session that the new, revised bill would be a high priority for 2015, and indicated that this time, the ‘bad actor’ language is softened. The non-severable bad star clauses of AB229 shown to become a sticking point for stakeholders, and caused a major schism between those who wanted PokerStars in the marketplace and people whom didn’t.
Sure enough, AB 167 seems to own eliminated those bad actor conditions, apparently clearing the method for PokerStars to enter a regulated California market. Those precluded from applying for a on-line poker license, states the bill, consist of:
‘The individual [who] has contemptuously defied an investigative that is legislative, or other formal investigative body of a state or of the United States or an international jurisdiction, when that body is engaged into the investigation of crimes relating to poker, official corruption related to poker activities, or unlawful profiteering activity or organized crime, as defined in area l 86.2 of the Penal Code.’
The bill continues on to clarify a position that is key could straight affect PokerStars possible entry into the Golden State market, given its previously vilified owners vs. its brand new, ‘clean slate’ ones.
‘ The person [who] has been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction of a felony consisting of either having accepted a bet over the Internet in violation of United States or California law, or having abetted or aided that unlawful activity.’
Note the employment of the word ‘person,’ which suggests that PokerStars, by divesting itself of its previous owners, against whom there were outstanding DOJ indictments, would be able to take part in the California on line market unscathed.
Anti-PokerStars Coalition Denounces Language
The language is in sharp contrast with that of final year’s bill from Jones-Sawyer, which proposed to exclude ‘any brand name or company title, including any brand that is derivative with the exact same or similar wording, or any trade or solution mark, software, technology, operational system, customer information, or other data acquired, derived, or developed directly or indirectly from any operation that has accepted a bet or engaged in a financial deal associated with such bet from any person in the us on any kind of online video gaming after December 31, 2006.’
If Jones-Sawyer believes his bill will sail through because of the backing for the stakeholders, however, he has another think coming, as the anti-PokerStars tribal coalition wasted no time in denouncing this language.
‘There is much for tribes to dislike relating to this bill,’ said Pechanga Chairman Mark Macarro. ‘We are disappointed that the bill disregards important principles from a broad coalition of respected tribes and card rooms that help avoid corporations and entities that previously violated law that is federal profiting from tainted software, brands, and databases derived from illegal activity.’
Photo Finish for Racetracks and Liquidity
Other news that is major AB 167 could be the inclusion of California racetracks in a post-regulation landscape, which many felt was in fact unjustly ignored by past bills. The sharing of liquidity with other states, expressly forbidden in preceding draft bills, appears to be on the menu this time, and there’s additionally a suggestion that players on unlicensed sites could be prosecuted.
The license fee would cost $10 million, having a tax-rate set at 8.5 percent of gross gaming revenue. Once language has been agreed upon, the bill shall require two-thirds associated with the vote to pass.
New Bill Would Decriminalize Fantasy Sports in Washington
State Senator Pam Roach introduced a bill that would legalize fantasy activities games in the state of Washington. (Image: PamRoach.com)
Their state of Washington is known for having a number of the harshest gambling that is online in the United States.
But these laws go even further than many realize: Washington also considers fantasy sports to be considered a form of gambling, and therefore players who put money into their online fantasy sports leagues are technically breaking the law, and could even be charged with a felony underneath the same guidelines that criminalize online poker and casino games.
That’s something which many local officials would prefer to be changed.
With an estimated 500,000 residents in the state playing dream sports games, State Senator Pam Roach (R-31st District) says it’s time and energy to reclassify the contests as being a game of skill rather than as luck-based gambling.
‘Our state views fantasy football as a game of chance a felony crime,’ Roach said. ‘Congress has long considered dream soccer become a game of skill. My bill will replace the state’s definition.’
Washington Residents Restricted from Fantasy Sports Sites
At this time, numerous major online fantasy sports outlets block Washington residents from participating on their sites, including top day-to-day dream sites like FanDuel and DraftKings.
Conventional season long leagues on web sites like ESPN.com are usually open to Washington residents, however they are typically ineligible to win rewards.
The problem is that many states see fantasy sports as a game of ability.
But the Washington State Gambling Commission nevertheless sees luck being a big enough factor to classify it as gambling under current state laws.
‘There’s always the chance the Seattle Seahawks will keep coming back from two touchdowns down with two minutes left,’ stated commission chairman Chris Stearns, discussing the Seahawks’ improbable comeback into the NFC Championship game last week-end. ‘Whereas in most states, the undeniable fact that you’ve invested all of this time poring over stats and making your own spreadsheets, that’s the skill part, and that weighs most heavily.’
Sports Betting Would Remain Prohibited
Beneath the proposed law, there would still be a prohibition on placing bets on the outcome of real world displaying events.
Nonetheless, both day-to-day and season-long fantasy sports will be expressly legal, even for real cash play.
The bill seemingly have better chances than a similar bill that would decriminalize and regulate online poker; the dream sports bill has bi-partisan support and has picked up lots of sponsors on both edges of the aisle.
Companion bills have been introduced in both the House of Representatives and their state Senate.
The legalization work is supported by the Fantasy Sports Trade Association, a market group based out of Chicago.
According towards the combined group, more than 41 million people in America and Canada play fantasy sports, and nearly half of them perform for real cash.
‘We think citizens of Washington ought to be in a position to play the full array of fantasy sports contests offered in 45 other states and be able to win prizes in free contests offered by major media businesses,’ stated relationship president Peter Schoenke in a statement.
Washington is one of five states in which residents are typically blocked from playing on day-to-day fantasy sports sites.
As we recently reported, momentum is increasing in several of these states to legalize such games: recently, a Montana lawmaker introduced a bill that would enable residents to participate in contests where the entry fee was $100 or less.
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker Rejects Kenosha Casino Project
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has rejected a casino that is proposed Kenosha, with some saying the move may be related to his presidential aspirations. (Image: Wikimedia Commons)
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has put the kibosh on a proposed casino plan, saying that building the venue would simply be very costly to taxpayers to be permitted.
In a declaration, Walker stated that the continuing state could have been liable for up to $100 million to your Potawatomi tribe, which owns a casino in Milwaukee, due to agreements between your tribe and their state.
Under the compact that governs the agreement between Wisconsin as well as the Potawatomi tribe, hawaii is responsible for reimbursing the tribe for any revenue lost to many other casinos that available in the state.
‘After a review that is comprehensive of potential economic impact of the proposed Kenosha casino project, the risk to the state’s taxpayers is too great,’ Walker stated in a declaration. ‘Due to the compacts negotiated by Governor Doyle, the cost that is current taxpayers of approving the proposed casino project is as much as $100 million and also the long-term economic hit to the state budget would be a potential loss of billions of dollars.’
The new casino, which would have cost about $800 million to build, would be to be a joint venture between the Menominee Tribe and intense Rock, which will have been responsible for operating the casino. The task had been approved in 2013 by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, however it still required approval from the governor of Wisconsin before it could go forward.
Casino Supporters See Politics Behind Decision
The Menominee Tribe saw other motivations behind his decision while Walker said the rejection was a way to protect residents of the state from a financial obligation.
‘One tribe, the Forest County Potawatomi and one goal of Governor Walker, the presidency, has resulted in a ‘no’ for the people,’ the tribe said in a declaration.
Many political observers believe that Walker could be planning a run at the Republican nomination for the presidency in 2016. The Menominee statement suggested that Walker’s decision was made to placate conservatives that are in opposition to casino gambling. One Iowa that is prominent conservative Tom Coates, recently composed a letter to Walker urging him to reject the casino. That letter ended up being additionally finalized by 600 caucus that is potential from Iowa.
Whatever the motivation behind Walker’s decision, many locals in Kenosha were disappointed in your choice.
‘ There were people ready to go to work down here, and that is perhaps not gonna take place now,’ Kenosha Mayor Keith Bosman told WTMJ.
With Kenosha away from the Way, Beloit Hopes for Federal Attention
It is possible that Kenosha’s loss could be Beloit’s gain. Supporters of a Ho-Chunk Nation casino in the city hope that the rejection associated with Menominee casino could suggest that their project will pass through federal now review more quickly.
The city and the tribe have had a deal that is preliminary place since 2012, but officials say they certainly were told that the Bureau of Indian Affairs ladbrokes casino practice were delaying a choice in part because of the Kenosha proposal. The Ho-Chunk were publicly opposed to the Kenosha task.
Regardless of the rejection, nonetheless, the Menominee say they will soldier on.
‘We must remember all of the Menominee country has overcome in more than 10,000 years,’ the tribe said in a declaration. ‘ We are going to continue steadily to thrive being a Nation and will continue to be partners that are honorable Indian Tribes in Wisconsin and around the country.’